Writing — beginning — to draw black out of white — to find, make sensible, and excitement, a vibration always-already within the sea of white ink. A return to the sea — a kind of world-earth-home: specifically one which many resist inhabiting. In the sea i cannot breathe; life and death rearranged. And so i am only nomad. Perhaps there is evolution, advancing, of advance in a future. These initial marks are a resource to be unleashed. As i write more-and-more, my lung capacity will increase: i will grow fins, scales, maybe even gills: all for dwelling.

Fear — writing must be terrifying, almost defined by terror? But fear? i am afraid … the words come out in spurts and sputters; can these gaps, the apartness of fear be heard on the page? The text to the eye is always “full” — though already crafted from black-and-white, interchange, never absence-presence. So: in rhythm? Writing is always of the ear, the voice. Spurts and sputters (i call them for now) — but not a resistance to discontinuity, fragmentation, the logic and rhythms of dreams. What rhythm is there is fearful writing? Perhaps it is (for now) enough to address an internal fear; do not worry about “expression” yet, as if it is some essential requirement of writing, to be observed. Perhaps then, the point of observing and overcoming fear is the same: in a looking at that abject thing, neither turning away nor toward, only to look, to smile; no lens, no mirror to see her face — it is already laughing, and as i continue, persistently, to look, a smile crosses my face; a smile of the schizophrenic walking down the street, the start of an aura.

Fear or what? — for tomorrow …

“As long as I have questions and no answers I’ll keep on writing. How do you start at the beginning, if things happen before they happen? If before the pre-prehistory there were already the apocalyptic monsters? If this story doesn’t exist now, it will. Thinking is an act. Feeling is a fact. Put the two together — I am the one writing what I am writing.” — C.L.

The Many Voices of “System Shock 2”

System Shock 2 remains one of the most lauded and influential video games of all time. While its genre is generally characterised as horror and action role-play, I suggest that this is an insufficient description. Rather the game is a tension between horror and ecstacy, agency and helplessness; these paradoxes are exemplified by the audio design of character dialogue. Our entanglement with the game operates in two directions: our “limit-experience” of the game world, as characterised by the multitudinous, medusoid sound of The Many and the cyborg connectivity of SHODAN’s emotionless affect; and our “limit-experience” as the player, our agency in building our character and our ability to give voice to these entities through our interaction with the UI. Yet the protagonist remains silent, and even as we project into the game world we are faced with certain expressive impossibilities. By contrasting the voicefullness of the non-player characters and voicelessness of the player character I identify the true ‘horror’ of the game as lying in a tension between a desire to join the chorus of The Many and the fact that we cannot chose to do so. If The Many is comprised of multiple voices, then is our silence another expression of these voices or their antithesis? If The Many is a distinct, Gestalt voice, then is our external silence is more closely related to SHODAN’s simultaneous cyborg interconnectedness and singular god-like megalomania? Does the audio design include our silence, or is the player outside of the game’s sound?

This paper was presented at the Ludo23 European Conference on Video Game Music and Sound
https://www.ludomusicology.org/ludo2023-programme-and-schedule/

PhD Thesis: Alors On Danse!

Think-Do-Living the Embodied Musicking Subject

This portfolio of compositions and commentary takes as its subject the musicking body and the entanglement of embodiment and composition. The five practical projects are all centred on a constellation of concerns about the musicking body which the thesis develops. The first chapter is a phenomenology of my creative practice, starting with my body sitting on a chair, at my desk. From this stationary position I draw out a series of continuities, discontinuities, and resonances, showing my composing body to be always entangled with all the material conditions of my practice. The second chapter, through a discussion of embodied perception, proposes that this body is a doubling of intense unification and indeterminacy. I begin with John Cage’s advocacy of ‘sound without purpose’ — sound that does not serve a predetermined outcome — and suggest that this implies that the musicking body is indeterminate and also syncretic. Synaesthesia and psychosis serve not only as ways of to approach this ‘sound without purpose’ but also as descriptors and inspirations for my practice. The third chapter situates the previous two in social contexts, particularly regarding gender — drawing heavily on the work of Hélène Cixous — and the limitations and opportunities presented by the Coronavirus pandemic. This thesis concludes by acknowledging the limitation of my research-practice, particularly regarding race, and by suggesting some new avenues and considerations for this research-practice to take in the future.

https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/31819/

The Musical Possibility of Queer Spaces

I clearly remember my first experience of attending a midnight screening of Rocky Horror Picture Show. I knew all the words (I must have watched it hundreds of times as a questioning teenager) but I wasn’t quite sure of the actions, the responses, the rituals, including many lewd references to people’s anatomies that I won’t repeat here. I was lucky enough to sit next to an immaculately dressed Frank-N-Furter who showed me what to do, what to say. There were at least two other notable Franks in the theatre. Off course there is Tim Curry’s fabulous performance on screen. Midnight screenings also have a ‘shadow cast’, members of the audience who act out the film in front of the screen, guaranteeing yet another Frank. All three were dressed in drag, but they also performed drags of each other, each remaking the transvestite from Transexual, Transylvania in their own unique way. 

Full article at: https://britishmusiccollection.org.uk/article/musical-possibilities-queer-spaces